Boltz Lake Fishing Report, Allan Erlick Now, Articles E

However, the final decision may not be only that of an acceptance or a rejection. Editor rejected manuscript claiming it is similar to a not-yet-published manuscript (that I haven't seen). The Senior Editor then assesses the manuscript for its quality and perceived level of advance and then either recommends a reject decision or assigns peer reviewers. good luck!! Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. who will be interested in the new results and why. . [CDATA[// > Which type of forging is used for Flashless forging? Thus it is not surprising that the first reaction to a rejection letter is often a sense that the editors must have made a mistake. All manuscripts are handled electronically throughout the consideration process. Do the revisions and resubmit. If a paper was rejected because the authors failed to persuade the referees that they had excluded alternative interpretations, then new data or analyses are likely to be required for the appeal to have any chance of success. How can we prove that the supernatural or paranormal doesn't exist? Research suggests that . Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. Additionally, for help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. and JavaScript. Yet, little is known about how these infrastructures support, stabilize, transform or change existing editorial practices. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. What the . After the Editor in Chief assigns the manuscript to an editor, the next task is "waiting for reviewer assignment" by that assigned editor. Make sure that your arguments are backed by solid evidence. 9.3 weeks. Sometimes they are more busy. Experiments gone wrong? In all these cases, it is likely that some time will elapse before Nature can respond, and the paper must not be submitted for publication elsewhere during this time. this is indeed the general case, also in my journal. The categories includeroughly in order of persuasivenessnew data or analysis, factual errors by referees or editors, disagreement with technical criticisms, evidence of referee bias, procedural concerns and disputes over novelty or significance. ensure that the figures and tables are clear and will fit in the space available. The Academic Editor being consulted will be asked to provide an advisory recommendation on the manuscript and may recommend acceptance, further peer-review, or uphold the original rejection decision. We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. Nature Neuroscience Papers are evaluated along multiple dimensions, including technical reliability, novelty and interest, but the final decision to accept or reject must collapse all this information into a single binary choice. More importantly, in the rejection letter it was evident that the Editor had taken the time to read through our manuscript and had given it some thought .